DEROSIER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• United States v. Wuagneux, 683 F.2d 1343 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …er letter was dated April 20, 1977, and receipt was acknowledged April 25, 1977. Cf. De Rosier v. United States, 218 F. 2d 420, 423 (5th Cir.) (two day interval between date of letter and receiving stamp supports inference of mailing), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 921, 75 S.Ct. 660, 99 L.Ed. 1253 (1955). This evidence supports a reasonable conclusion that the documents were prepared, executed and mailed from Florida, and accordingly venue was proper. Ill — ADMISSIBILITY OF AGENT MICHALAK’S TESTIMONY Part of the…
• Alexander v. United States, 290 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …2d 666; Grimes v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 234 F. 2d 571; Watson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 224 F. 2d 910; Helton v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 221 F. 2d 338; Shurman v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 219 [*254] F. 2d 282, certiorari denied 349 U.S. 921, 75 S.Ct. 661, 99 L.Ed. 1253. After the decisions of the Supreme Court in Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 80 S.Ct. 1437, 4 L.Ed.2d 1669, Rios v. United States, 364 U.S. 253, 80 S.Ct. 1431, 4 L.Ed.2d 1688, Euziere v. United States, 364 U.S. 2…
• United States v. Candella, 487 F.2d 1223 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …what transpired in Manhattan was irrelevant for venue purposes. See United States v. Miller, 246 F. 2d 486 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 905, 78 S.Ct. 332, 2 L.Ed.2d 261 (1957); De Rosier v. United States, 218 F. 2d 420 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 921, 75 S.Ct. 660, 99 L.Ed. 1253 (1955). Appellants seek to distinguish Miller and De Rosier because the City and not the defendants (as in those cases) forwarded the offending documents to Manhattan. The City’s accepting the papers in Brooklyn, howev…