ATKINSON
v.
ELLIS, GENERAL MANAGER, TEXAS PRISON SYSTEM, ET AL.
ATKINSON
ELLIS, GENERAL MANAGER, TEXAS PRISON SYSTEM, ET AL.
349 U.S. 924
Supreme Court of the United States (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Harris, 436 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1970)…assume that a Board, in making a classification decision, has considered all pertinent material in a registrant’s file. See Skinner v. United States, 215 F. 2d 767 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 981, 75 S.Ct. 572, 99 L.Ed. 763, rehearing denied, 349 U.S. 924, 75 S.Ct. 659, 99 L.Ed. 1256 (1954). See also Lewis v. United States, 279 U.S. 63, 49 S.Ct. 257, 73 L.Ed. 615 (1928); Greer v. United States, 378 F. 2d 931 (5th Cir. 1967); Clark v. United States, 236 F. 2d 13 (9th Cir. 1956). Harris attempts to mak…
-
United States v. Neckels, 451 F.2d 709 (9th Cir. 1971)…umstances, we are required to assume that the appeal board considered all pertinent material in appellant’s file. Skinner v. United States, 215 F. 2d 767 (9th Cir. 1954), cert. denied 348 U.S. 981, 75 S.Ct. 572, 99 L.Ed. 763 (1955), rehearing denied 349 U.S. 924, 75 S.Ct. 659, 99 L.Ed. 1256 (1955). This presumption of regularity has been recognized and applied by us to both local and appeal board actions. United States v. Harris, 436 F. 2d 775, 777 (9th Cir.1970), cert. denied 402 U.S. 981, 91 S.Ct. 1645, 2…
-
Maddox v. United States, 264 F.2d 243 (6th Cir. 1959)…e classification is incorrect. United States v. Nichols, 7 Cir., 241 F. 2d 1; Frank v. United States, 9 Cir., 236 F. 2d 39; Skinner v. United States, 9 Cir., 215 F. 2d 767, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 981, 75 S.Ct. 572, 99 L.Ed. 763, rehearing denied 349 U.S. 924, 75 S.Ct. 659, 99 L.Ed. 1256; United States v. Dorn, D.C.Wis., 121 F.Supp. 171. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.…