INDIAN TOWING CO., INC. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Ryan Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Pan-Atlantic S.S. Corp., 350 U.S. 124 (U.S. 1956)
  …a brief as amicus curiae in support of the shipowner and took part in the oral argument. 348 U. S. 948. The judgment was affirmed by an equally divided Court, 349 U. S. 901, but the case was restored to the docket for reargument before a full Court, 349 U. S. 926. 1. The first question is whether the Longshoremen’s Compensation Act precludes the assertion by a shipowner of a stevedoring contractor’s liability to it, where the contractor is also the employer of the injured longshoreman. Neither court below…
• Indian Towing Co., Inc. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1955)
  …judgment of the Court of Appeals was affirmed by an equally divided Court, 349 U. S. 902, but a petition for rehearing was granted, the earlier judgment in this Court vacated, and the case restored to the docket for reargument before the full Bench. 349 U. S. 926. The relevant provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act are 28 U. S. C. §§ 1346 (b), 2674, and 2680 (a): § 1346 (b). “. . . the district courts . . . shall have exclusive jurisdiction of civil actions on claims against the United States, for money…
• Builders Corp. OF Am. v. United States, 259 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1958)
  …e Fifth Circuit affirmed. Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 5 Cir., 211 F. 2d 886. The Supreme Court of the United States first affirmed by an equally divided court, 349 U.S. 902, 75 S.Ct. 575, 99 L.Ed. 1239, then restored the case for reargument, 349 U.S. 926, 75 S.Ct. 769, 99 L.Ed. 1257. Finally, by a five to four decision, the judgment of the Court of Appeals was there reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court for further proceedings, 350 U.S. 61, 76 S.Ct. 122, 100 L.Ed. 48. Great emphasis…