HEIKKILA

v.

BARBER, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179 (U.S. 1956)
  …ed the opinion of the Court. Because of conflicting constructions by the Courts of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits of § 235 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 66 Stat. 163, 198, we brought these cases here. 349 U. S. 904; 349 U. S. 927. They were heard in sequence, and, since minor differences in their facts are irrelevant to the problems now before us, they may be disposed of in one opinion. Section 235 (a) 1 provides that any immigration officer “shall have power to require by…
• Shung v. Brownell, 227 F.2d 40 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
  …it neither was nor could have been decided in the previous suit, filed before the Act took effect.2 Reversed. . 66 Stat 163, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq. . In this respect we disagree with Heikkila v. Barber, 9 Cir., 216 F. 2d 497, certiorari denied 349 U.S. 927, 75 S.Ct. 769.…