IN RE BALTZEGAR

Citator

Cited By

• Ullmann v. United States, 350 U.S. 422 (U.S. 1956)
  …med the judgment of the District Court. 221 F. 2d 760. The importance of the questions at issue, in view of the differences between the legislation sustained in Brown v. Walker, 161 U. S. 591, and the Act under review, led us to bring the case here. 349 U. S. 951. [*426] Four major questions are raised by this appeal: Is the immunity provided by the Act sufficiently broad to displace the protection afforded by the privilege against self-in crimination? Assuming that the statutory requirements are met, does t…
• Affronti v. United States, 350 U.S. 79 (U.S. 1955)
  …al sentences. See note 12, supra. Congress has done nothing since this Court's decision in United States v. Murray, supra, to indicate that probation power should be applied after the beginning of any term of a sentence. Affirmed. 221 F. 2d 150. 349 U. S. 951. The Fourth Circuit appears to be in accord with the Eighth Circuit on this question. Mann v. United States, 218 F. 2d 936. The Tenth Circuit, obiter dictum, in White v. Steigleder, 37 F. 2d 858, 859, is in accord with the Ninth Circuit. See also K…
• United States v. Leslie Salt Co., 350 U.S. 383 (U.S. 1956)
  …slie Salt, following payment of the tax under protest and the Commissioner’s denial of a refund, the District Court2 and the Court of Appeals3 held the instruments not to be “debentures” or otherwise subject to stamp taxes. We brought the case here, 349 U. S. 951, to resolve the uncertainty left by lower court [*386] decisions as to whether § 1801 applies to corporate notes of this type.4 Except as to amounts' and payees, the two instruments in question were in identical terms, having these principal featur…