PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE CO.

v.

WACKERLE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hatridge v. AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co., 415 F.2d 809 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …Nostromo, Inc. v. Fahrenkrog, 388 F. 2d 82, 85 (8 Cir. 1968); Peacock & Peacock, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. Co., 332 F. 2d 499, 504-505 (8 Cir. 1964); Wackerle v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co., 219 F. 2d 1, 7, 52 A.L.R.2d 814 (8 Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 955, 75 S.Ct. 884, 99 L.Ed. 1279. Standing alone, therefore, and apart from the action instituted earlier by Mrs. Hatridge against Aetna in the state court, federal jurisdiction existed for Aetna’s declaratory judgment action and Judge Harris’ decision…
• The Tlingit & Haida Indians OF Alaska & Harry Douglas v. The United States, 389 F.2d 778 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  …(1894). This court has repeatedly adhered to that rule of law. Aleut Community of St. Paul Island v. United States, 117 F.Supp. 427, 431, 127 Ct.Cl. 328, 334 (1954). Cf. Bishop v. United States, 126 F.Supp. 449, 130 Ct.Cl. 198 (1954), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 955, 99 L.Ed. 1279, 75 S.Ct. 884 (1955); Fleming v. United States 352 F. 2d 533 173 Ct.Cl. 426 (1965). There are no exclusive rights to fish in Indians. United States v. Winans, 198 U.S. 371, 25 S.Ct. 662, 49 L.Ed. 1089 (1905). An Indian tribe might ex…
• Miller v. The United States, 620 F.2d 812 (Ct. Cl. 1980)
  …sions, in any event, provide a basis for recovery of severance damages. See United States v. Pope & Talbot, Inc., 293 F. 2d 822, 826 (9th Cir. 1961); Bishop v. United States, 130 Ct.Cl. 198, 201, 203-04, 126 F.Supp. 449, 451-52 (1954), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 955, 75 S.Ct. 884, 99 L.Ed. 1279 (1955). . This estimate was predicated on extra costs which would be incurred in moving equipment to and from other gravel bar deposit sources, on the remainder land, over a period of some 20 to 25 years. It was estimat…