WITT

v.

MCGEE, DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Admiral Theatre Corp. v. The Douglas Theatre Co., 585 F.2d 877 (8th Cir. 1978)
  …“[A] distributor has the right to license or refuse to license his film to any exhibitor, pursuant to his own reasoning, so long as he acts independently.” Paramount Film Distrib. Corp. v. Applebaum, 217 F. 2d 101, 124 (5th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 961, 75 S.Ct. 892, 99 L.Ed. 1284 (1955). It is undisputed that during the relevant time period all theatres in the Omaha-Council Bluffs market area, and particularly those in the downtown area,9 had difficulty securing quality first-run pictures. Whil…
• Watson v. United States, 439 F.2d 442 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …be deemed sufficient evidence to authorize conviction unless the defendant explains the possession to the satisfaction of the jury. . See notes 40 and 41 supra. . See, e. g., Bates v. United States, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 219 F. 2d 30, cert. denied, 349 U.S. 961, 75 S.Ct. 891, 99 L.Ed. 1283 (1955); United States v. White, 228 F. 2d 832 (7 Cir. 1956). In Yee Hem v. United States, supra note 37, in which the Supreme Court upheld the presumptions of 21 U.S.C. § 174, supra note 41, the defendant had been charg…
• United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …which discuss the importance of an impartial jury. See, e. g., Mattox v. United States, 1892, 146 U.S. 140, 149-50, 13 S.Ct. 50, 53, 36 L.Ed. 917, 921; Paramount Film Distrib. Corp. v. Applebaum, 5 Cir. 1954, 217 F. 2d 101, 105, cert. denied, 1955, 349 U.S. 961, 75 S.Ct. 892, 99 L.Ed. 1284. Martinez contends that this Court must follow the test articulated in United States v. McKinney, 5 Cir. 1970, 429 F. 2d 1019. Implicit in [prior cases] is the assumption that when jury misconduct is alleged in the defe…