HARRIET E. HOOK AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS

v.

JOHN LINTON, CURATOR

Citator

Cited By

• Usatorre v. THE Victoria, 172 F.2d 434 (2d Cir. 1949)
• Sword Line, Inc. v. United States, 230 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …ples may include United States v. La Vengeance, 3 Dall. 297, 300, 3 U.S. 297, 300, 1 L.Ed. 610, libel for a statutory penalty involving export of arms, “a water transaction”; Hobart v. Drogan (The Hope), 10 Pet. 108, 119, 120, 35 U.S. 108, 119, 120, 9 L.Ed. 363, libel on a state statute for compulsory pilotage ; Ex parte McNiel, 13 Wall. 236, 242, 80 U.S. 236, 242, 20 L.Ed. 624, a similar case; The J. E. Rumbell, 148 U.S. 1, 12, 13 S.Ct. 498, 37 L.Ed. 345, libel on a state statute giving a lien for a marit…
• United States v. Middleton, 3 F.2d 384 (4th Cir. 1924)
  …one. It is only where an error of law has been plainly made, or the award is clearly and manifestly inadequate, that there should he an increase in the same by the appellate court. The Sybil, 4 Wheat. 98, 4 L. Ed. 522; Hobert v. Drogan, 10 Pet. 119, 9 L. Ed. 363; The Camanche, 8 Wall. 448, 19 L. Ed. 397; The Ariadne, 13 Wall. 475, 20 L. Ed. 542; Oelwerke Teutonia v. Erlanger, 248 U. S. 251, 39 S. Ct. 180, 63 L. Ed. 399; The R. R. Rhodes, 82 F. 751, 27 C. C. A. 258; The Kia Ora, 252 F. 507, 164 C. C. A. 4…