JOPEPH A. WHERRY AND OTHERS, HEIRS OF MACKEY WHERRY DECEASED, APPELLANTS
v.
THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The heirs of Mackey Wherry appealed a district court decision rejecting their claim to sixteen hundred arpents of land in Missouri based on a 1802 grant from the lieutenant-governor of Upper Louisiana that lacked a specific land description and was not located before the deadline established by the 1824 Land Claims Act. The Supreme Court affirmed the rejection, holding that because the grant contained no description of the lands and was not located within the time prescribed by the 1824 Act, the title could not be confirmed.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Mr Justice Baldwin delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an appeal from the decree of the district, court of Missouri, rejecting the claim of the appellants to sixteen hundred arpents of land in that state, for the confirmation of which they had filed their petition, pursuant to the provisions of the act of 1824 for the adjustment of land claims in that state.
The petition was in the form prescribed by the law; presenting a proper case for the jurisdiction of the court.
The claim of the petitioners was founded on an application by Mackey Wherry to the lieutenant-governor of Upper Louisiana, on the 15th of April 1802, for a grant of sixteen hundred arpents of land near the rivers Dardennes’ and Mississippi, in the vacant lands of the king, which he shall point out at tire lime of the survey. On the 18th of the samé month this application was granted by the lieutenant-governor, with directions to survey the quantity demanded in a vacant place of the royal domain ; but no survey appears to have been made before the 10th of March 1804.
• As this grant contained no description of the lands granted, and was not located before the time prescribed by the act of 1824, submitting these cases to judicial cognizance ; it comes directly within the point decided by this court in the case of John Smith, T. v. The United States at this term, and cannot be confirmed. It is -therefore our opinion that the title of the petitioners to the land claimed and described in their petition is not valid.
The decree of the district court is affirmed.
This cause came on to-be heard on the transcript of the record from the district court of the United States for the district of Missouri, and was argued by counsel; on consideration whereof, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said district court in this cause be, and the same is hereby affirmed.