NORTH CAROLINA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
NORTH CAROLINA ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
350 U.S. 805
Supreme Court of the United States (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chicago v. Illinois, 355 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1958)…els either course or denies the ICC the power to determine the question presented by the railroad’s petition, whatever may have been the evidence presented before the State Commission. See North Carolina v. United States, 128 F. Supp. 718, affirmed, 350 U. S. 805; Illinois v. United States, 101 F. Supp. 36, 47, affirmed, 342 U. S. 930. Finally, it is argued that the District Court erred in setting aside so much of the ICC order as authorized an increase in the interstate fares to the two Wisconsin points. W…
-
Utah Power & Light Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 747 F.2d 721 (D.C. Cir. 1984)…rates until remedies under state law had been exhausted” is “[cjertainly ... without merit”; “[t]he Commission in discharging the duties imposed upon it by Congress may not be delayed by proceedings before state courts or commissions”), aff'd mem., 350 U.S. 805, 76 S.Ct. 45, 100 L.Ed. 723 (1955).5 The federal courts’ refusal to impose on the ICC’s administrative authority a total-exhaustion-of-state-remedies requirement is hardly surprising. It is true that, as a matter of federal law, federal courts have…