ROGERS

v.

TEETS, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Gen. Stores Corp. v. Shlensky, 350 U.S. 462 (U.S. 1956)
  …(52 Stat. 883, as amended, 11 U. S. C. § 501 et seq.) for a corporate reorganization. The District Court granted the motions. 129 F. Supp. 801. The Court of Appeals affirmed by a [*464] divided vote. 222 F. 2d 234. The case is here on certiorari. 350 U. S. 809. Petitioner, formerly known as D. A. Schulte, Inc., has operated for some years a chain of stores for the sale of tobacco and accessory products. Petitioner has also had a chain of difficulties. Its financial problems go back at least to 1936 when…
• In re Application of Burwell, 350 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1956)
  …tain applications for certificates of probable cause, under 28 U. S. C. § 2253, addressed to that court instead of to a judge or judges thereof. Accordingly, we reversed the judgments in these cases. Burwell v. Teets, 350 U. S. 808; Rogers v. Teets, 350 U. S. 809. Each of these cases was reversed “so that the petitioner’s application for a certificate of probable cause may be entertained on its merits.” We did not attempt to lay down a procedure for the Court of Appeals to follow for the entertainment of su…
• Earlie Burgess v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, 284 F.2d 486 (4th Cir. 1960)
  …cause, under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253, addressed to that court instead of to a judge or judges thereof. Accordingly, we reversed the judgments in these cases. Burwell v. Teets, 350 U.S. 808, 76 S.Ct. 98, [100 L.Ed. 726] Rogers v. Teets, 350 U.S. 809, 76 S.Ct. 98, [100 L.Ed. 726]. Each of these cases was reversed ‘so that the petitioner’s application for a certificate of probable cause may be entertained on its merits.’ “We did not attempt to lay down a procedure for the Court of Appeals to fol…

Authorities Cited

• House v. Mayo, 324 U.S. 42 (U.S. 1945)