WHITEHOUSE ET AL.

v.

ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Cahill v. New York, 351 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1956)
  …ould judge from the tone of the opinion in that case that the Court would not have reached a different result had the second motion for rehearing been labeled a “motion to recall the judgment.” [*188] Our action in Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., 350 U. S. 811, does not justify the Court in granting this motion to rehear a petition for rehearing formerly denied. In that case Boudoin appealed from a judgment of the District Court in his favor, claiming: (a) the amount of damages awarded him was inadequate;…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Ohio Power Co., 353 U.S. 98 (U.S. 1957)
  …m v. United States, 347 U. S. 1007; Banks v. United States, 347 U. S. 1007; McFee v. United States, 347 U. S. 1007; Remmer v. United States, 348 U. S. 904; Florida ex rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control, 350 U. S. 413; Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., 350 U. S. 811; Cahill v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 351 U. S. 183; Achilli v. United States, 352 U. S. 1023. Reversed. Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Walters v. Moore-McCORMACK Lines, Inc., 309 F.2d 191 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …icious disposition or savage nature, his presence on board ship may merit a jury finding that the defendant had breached its warranty of [*193] seaworthiness.2 See Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co., 348 U.S. 336, 75 S.Ct. 382, 99 L.Ed. 354, modified, 350 U.S. 811, 76 S.Ct. 38, 100 L.Ed. 727 (1955); Keen v. Overseas Tankship Corp., 194 F. 2d 515 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 966, 72 S.Ct. 1061, 96 L.Ed. 1363 (1952); Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc., 168 F.Supp. 153 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff’d, 263 F. 2d…

  ← 1 / 3 →