NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

v.

SEAMPRUFE, INC. (HOLDENVILLE PLANT)

Citator

Cited By

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 351 U.S. 105 (U.S. 1956)
  …impediment to the freedom of communication essential to the exercise of its employees’ rights to self organization.” Because of the conflicting decisions on a recurring phase of enforcement of the National Labor Relations Act, we granted certiorari. 350 U. S. 818, 894. In each of these cases the Board found that the employer violated §8 (a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 61 Stat. 140, making it an unfair labor practice for an employer to interfere with employees in the exercise of rights guaranteed…
• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sw. Exploration Co., 350 U.S. 308 (U.S. 1956)
  …ase, the Court of Claims held that one of the upland owners, Huntington Beach Co., respondent in No. 287, was entitled to the depletion allowance on its share of the net income, 132 Ct. Cl. 427, 132 F. Supp. 718. We granted certiorari in both cases, 350 U. S. 818, because both-the drilling company and the upland owners cannot be entitled to depletion on the same income. We agree with the Court of Claims.1 [*310] The California State Lands Act of 1938 provided that the State’s offshore oil might be extracted…
• S. Pac. Co. v. Gileo, 351 U.S. 493 (U.S. 1956)
  …t applicable, and judgment was entered for petitioner before trial was had on the issues of negligence and damages. The Supreme Court of California held, in separate decisions, that the Act applied to each of the respondents.2 We granted certiorari, 350 U. S. 818, because the cases involve interpretation of an important federal statute governing railroad employer obligations to its injured employees. In the Eufrazia and Eelk cases, the Supreme Court of California simply entered an order reversing the decisi…