REMMER
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1955-10-10
No. 156
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
350 U.S. 820 Supreme Court of the United States (1955) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Remmer v. United States, 350 U.S. 377 (U.S. 1956)
    …nd affirmed the petitioner’s conviction in a per curiam opinion. 222 F. 2d 720. The case is here again on certiorari, limited to the question of the effect of the extraneous communications with the juror upon the petitioner’s right to a fair trial. 350 U. S. 820. The District Court read our opinion and mandate to mean that “the incident complained of” to be inquired into at the hearing was the purpose and effect of the F. B. I. investigation. The District Court found that the purpose of the F. B. I. inves…
  • …“2. In the alternative, may the lessee-petitioner consider the excess payment over the determined value of the land to be in the nature of a prepayment of rent for the remaining term of the extinguished lease and amortize such amount over 21 years?” 350 U. S. 820. Petitioner asserted, but did not argue, the permissibility of the deduction of the $1,440,000 as a loss under § 23 (f). Such an assertion is apparently premised on the assumption that the $1,440,000 represents the sum paid for commutation of the r…
  • …ble office rents to show a real premium over rental value, or in short that there was anything in the nature of wasting assets to be written off. The recent case of Millinery Center Bldg. Corp. v. C. I. R., 2 Cir., 221 F. 2d 322, certiorari granted 350 U.S. 820, 76 S.Ct. 79, relied on by the taxpayers, involved substantially different facts and a quite different measure of proof. Affirmed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw