LEADMAN

v.

GREYHOUND CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• United States v. Noble C. Beasley, 519 F.2d 233 (8th Cir. 1975)
  …equired. The government need only show that a “substantial” amount of tax liability was willfully evaded. E. g., Harris v. United States, 356 F. 2d 582, 585 (5th Cir. 1966); United States v. Burdick, 221 F. 2d 932, 934 (3rd Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 831, 76 S.Ct. 65, 100 L.Ed. 742 (1955). Sasser v. United States, 208 F. 2d 535, 539 (5th Cir. 1953). This is not to say that anything less than due care may be used to insure accuracy in the government’s calculations or that such calcula [*249] tions ma…
• United States v. Granello, 365 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …ion in the “series of acts or transactions” resulting in the receipt of income for the Pacheco shares does not satisfy Rule 8(b) since they did not constitute an offense. The decision in Turner v. United States, 222 F. 2d 926 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 831, 76 S.Ct. 65, 100 L.Ed. 742 (1955), on which the Government heavily relies, is inapposite because the court regarded the case as one in which the indictments there consolidated had charged the defendants with jointly falsifying records and filing fa…
• Luther F. Grant and Sirrka v. Grant, 282 F.2d 165 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …that one of the agents was a special agent (whose presence, petitioners allege, shows an intent to develop facts leading to criminal prosecution) has been held irrelevant, Turner v. United States, 4 Cir., 222 F. 2d 926, 930, certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 831, 76 S.Ct. 65, 100 L.Ed. 742; and the only affirmative misrepresentation alleged as to the nature of the investigation postdated the voluntary delivery of the records. In those cases where an evidentiary hearing is required, the court should proceed…