WATERMAN STEAMSHIP CORP.

v.

TRIPLE A MACHINE SHOP, INC.

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 (U.S. 1974)
  …r to have applied a general rule that such a violation is not reversible error unless the defendant demonstrates that he has been prejudiced. United States v. Hall, 200 F. 2d 957 (CA2 1953); United States v. Titus, 221 F. 2d 571 (CA2), cert. denied, 350 U. S. 832 (1955); United States v. Fernandez, 456 F. 2d 638 (CA2 1972); Hodges v. United States, 243 F. 2d 281 (CA5 1957); Sultan v. United States, 249 F. 2d 385 (CA5 1957). Others appear to have adopted a rule whereby a violation is not reversible error wher…
• Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc., 234 F.2d 538 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …ertiorari denied 346 U.S. 827, 74 S.Ct. 46, 98 L.Ed. 351, or— even more conveniently — eschew all reference to the matter. Mastercrafters Clock & Radio Co. v. Vancheron & Con-stantin-Le Coultre Watches, Inc., 2 Cir., 221 F. 2d 464, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 832, 76 S.Ct. 67. The latter is the course taken below in a decision and judgment which we are finding correct and which in all its major essentials is admittedly subject to federal law. As a matter of fact it requires rather diligent search to find a…
• Truck Equip. Serv. Co. v. Fruehauf Corp., 536 F.2d 1210 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …er, given the intent of Fruehauf to trade upon the reputation of TESCO, the inference that a likelihood of confusion would arise is inescapable. See Mastercrafts C. & R. Co. v. Vacheron & Const.—LE C. W., 221 F. 2d 464, 467 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 832, 76 S.Ct. 67, 100 L.Ed. 743 (1955); note 13 supra. Fruehauf’s reliance upon the fact that its trailer was labeled as its own product and sold through its own channels of distribu [*1221] tion is not only misplaced, but also self-defeating. Actual c…

  ← 1 / 2 →