TAYLOR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• United States v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678 (3d Cir. 1964)
  …wer in this regard must be viewed in light of Rule 30 and in no event can be exercised except in situations where the error is such as to involve a manifest miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Vasen, 222 F. 2d 3 (7 Cir.), certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 834, 76 S.Ct. 70, 100 L.Ed. 744 (1955). Conceding that it may have been unnecessary for the court to charge that Provenzano might be convicted as an aider and abettor within the meaning of Section 2, 18 U.S.C., we conclude that any error in this regard…
• Am. Safety Equip. Corp. v. J. P. Maguire & Co., Inc., 391 F.2d 821 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …oceedings, coupled with a claim for declaratory relief, has a pronounced equitable cast. See Greenstein v. National Skirt & Sportswear Ass’n, 274 F. 2d 430 (2d Cir. 1960); Wilson Bros. v. Textile Workers Union, 224 F. 2d 176 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 834, 76 S.Ct. 70, 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955). However, the action against Maguire is not in a vacuum; it is, instead, an inte [*825] gral part of the dispute between ASE and Hickok, including ASE’s declaratory judgment action against Hickok. ASE sought to en…
• United States v. Ryan, 455 F.2d 728 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Disobedience or resistance to a lawful order of the court is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). Failure to obey a subpoena is contempt. Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(g). Taylor v. United States, 221 F. 2d 809 (6th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 834, 76 S.Ct. 69,100 L.Ed. 744 (1955). The District Court stated at the hearings on post-trial motions: “The gravamen and thrust of the Government’s case was that the grand jury was presented with records which were not the true records of the company…