STELLA

v.

KAISER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678 (3d Cir. 1964)
  …in this regard with respect to Provenzano’s relationship to Communale, was neither plain nor af [*691] fected substantial rights within the purview of Rule 52(b). See and compare United States v. Lurie, 222 F. 2d 11, 16 (7 Cir.), certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 835, 76 S.Ct. 71, 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955). The general rule is that in order to convict a defendant of aiding and abetting the commission of a substantive offense, the proof must establish that the crime in question was committed by someone and that the p…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Comfort, Inc., 365 F.2d 867 (8th Cir. 1966)
  …s with the strikers, Respondent referred to them as “former employees.” Respondent’s cases of Kansas Milling Co. v. N. L. R. B., 185 F. 2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950) and Shopmen’s Local No. 733 v. N. L. R. B., 219 F. 2d 874 (6th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 835, 76 S.Ct. 70, 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955), are distinguishable on their facts and consequently not controlling in the case at hand.6 Considering the record as a whole, therefore, we find that there is substantial evidence to sustain the Board’s conclusion…
• Shlensky v. Dorsey, 574 F.2d 131 (3d Cir. 1978)
  …of the claims in controversy in the suit now before us will eliminate their further litigation in the District Court for the District of Columbia under the doctrine of res judicata, citing Stella v. Kaiser, 218 F. 2d 64 (2d Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 835, 76 S.Ct. 71, 100 L.Ed. 745 (1955).9a The [*144] Project contends, however, that the claims of fraud based upon Wild’s so-called “sham” payment to Gulf and Gulf’s rehiring of Wild are distinctly different from any claims pleaded in the suit before u…

  ← 1 / 2 →