LANDELL, EXECUTOR, ET AL.

v.

NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO., FORMERLY THE SUPERIOR & ST. CROIX RAILWAY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 396 U.S. 491 (U.S. 1970)
  …ted States District Court for the District of Columbia held the action barred by laches and dismissed the complaint. Landell v. Northern Pacific R. Co., 122 F. Supp. 253 (D. C. D. C. 1954), aff’d, 96 U. S. App. D. C. 24, 223 F. 2d 316, cert. denied, 350 U. S. 844 (1955). In this context we think the Commission did not err in assuming jurisdiction over the applicants while refusing to adjudicate the merits of Railway’s title. As the District Court stated, “[f]or purposes of merger proceedings it could rely on…
• Powell v. Zuckert, 366 F.2d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …n, 8 Cir., 51 F. 493 (1892) (17 years); De Estrada v. San Felipe Land & Water Co., C.C.S.D. Cal., 46 F. 280 (1891) (14 years); Landell v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co., D.D.C., 122 F.Supp. 253 (1954), aff’d, 96 U.S. App.D.C. 24, 223 F. 2d 316, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 844, 76 S.Ct. 85, 100 L.Ed. 752 (1955) (over 50 years). . E. g., Washington v. Opie, supra Note 2 (lawyer plaintiff claimed he could not afford lawyer); Davis v. Tennessee Valley Authority, N.D.Ala., 214 F.Supp. 229 (1962), aff’d, 5 Cir., 313 F. 2d 959…
• Landell v. N. Pac. Ry. Co., 238 F.2d 30 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
  …ue, no fact remotely suggesting any such infirmity in the present judgment appears here. The order of the District Court upon the mandate of this court is Affirmed. . D.C.1954, 122 F.Supp. 253. . 1955, 96 U.S.App.D.C. 24, 223 F. 2d 316. . 1955, 350 U.S. 844, 76 S.Ct. 85.…