CITY OF HIALEAH AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
FRED T. HUNT, HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY CO. AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS; CITY OF HIALEAH AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, PETITIONERS, V. FRED T. HUNT, JR. AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1965-10-06
Nos. 34279, 34278
THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CALDWELL, and ERVIN, JJ. concur.
182 So. 2d 405 Florida Supreme Court (1965) Caution
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petitions for writs of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 1, 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petitions are therefore denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CALDWELL, and ERVIN, JJ. concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …at. (1979). . This case does not involve seasonal, agricultural labor, referred to in section 440.02(1 )(c)2, Florida Statutes (1974 Supp.). . See also Farrens Tree Surgeons v. Winkles, 334 So. 2d 569 (Fla.1976); Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. Alday, 182 So. 2d 405 (Fla.1966). . See Fort v. Hood’s Dairy, Inc., 143 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1962); Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. v. Bell, 116 So. 2d 617 (Fla.1959). See also A. Larson, 2 The Law of Workmen’s Compensation § 57.00 (1976 & Supp. 1980). . See Board of County Comm’r…
  • Keith v. News & SUN Sentinel Co., 667 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1995)
    …workers of this State with respect to injuries produced by and arising out of and in the course of employment. Any doubt concerning the com-pensability of a particular claim is to be resolved in favor of coverage. Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. Alday, 182 So. 2d 405, 406 (Fla.1966). Concomitantly, exclusion from coverage is to be given limited scope by restrictive interpretation. Miranda v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 229 So. 2d 232, 235 (Fla.1969). Although we do not find that this policy factor contro…
    1 / 2
  • …t to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A. Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Thomas Smith Farms, Inc. v. Alday, Fla., 182 So. 2d 405, opinion filed February 2, 1966. The petition is therefore denied. THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS,. DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THOMAS and CALDWELL, JJ., dissent.…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw