PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO.
v.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.
PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION ET AL.
350 U.S. 868
Supreme Court of the United States (1955)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Massey-Harris-Ferguson v. Hon. Marion Speed Boyd, 242 F.2d 800 (6th Cir. 1957)….Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95; Travelers Health Ass’n v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 339 U.S. 643, 70 S.Ct. 927, 94 L.Ed. 1154; Scholnik v. National Airlines, 6 Cir., 219 F. 2d 115, certiorari denied 349 U.S. 956, 75 S.Ct. 882, 99 L.Ed. 1280, rehearing denied 350 U.S. 868, 76 S.Ct. 99, 100 L.Ed. 769. In the present state of the litigation we consider it inadvisable to rule on the issue involved. The record in its present shape indicates that the question is a difficult one, and the ruling doubtful, both as a matter…
-
Memphis Light v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 243 F.2d 628 (D.C. Cir. 1957)…einafter referred to as the “pix>eline proceedings.” Panhandle sought review in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Go. v. Federal Power Comm., 3 Cir., 1955, 219 F. 2d 729, certiorari denied, 349 U.S. 945, 75 S.Ct. 874, 99 L.Ed. 1272, rehearing denied 1955, 350 U.S. 868, 76 S.Ct. 99, 300 L.Ed. 769. . 52 Stat. 831, 15 U.S.C.A. § 717r (a) and (b). . We wished to explore fully the possible impact upon the four independent producers of the Court’s opinion in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. State of Wisconsin, 1954, 347 U.S…
-
Util. Users League & Nickolas L. Barnes v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 394 F.2d 16 (7th Cir. 1968)…nati Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 101 U.S. App.D.C. 1, 246 F. 2d 688 (1957); Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 3 Cir., 219 F. 2d 729, cert. denied, 349 U.S. 945, 75 S.Ct. 874, 99 L.Ed. 1272, reh. denied, 350 U.S. 868, 76 S.Ct. 99, 100 L.Ed. 769 (1955). In determining petitioners’ standing to seek review in this court we are not bound by the Commission’s order granting petitioners leave to intervene in the proceeding before the Commission. Petitioners’ standing…