BLACKMAN

v.

BALABAN & KATZ CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Garber, 607 F.2d 92 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …s error for trial court to instruct jury that particular accounting technique was unjustified, but upholding conviction since the overall instruction on intent clearly indicated that it was the Government’s duty to demonstrate intent), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 874, 76 S.Ct. 119, 100 L.Ed. 772 (1955). In summary, the cases cited by the majority stand for the proposition that the trial judge may not refuse the defense of lack of intent or hinder its usefulness by creating a [*108] presumption which lowers the…
• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …v. Kifer, 348 U. S. 917. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern R. Co. v. Crowley et al:," 348 U. S. 927. ' Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co. v. Wright, 349 U. S. 905. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Chancey, 349 U. S. 916. Great Northern R. Co. v. Hallada, 350 U. S. 874. New York Central R. Co. v. Ruddy, 350 U. S. 884. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. Co. v. Cereste, 351 U. S. 951. Louisiana & Arkansas R. Co. v. Moore, 351 U. S. 952. Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Buckles et al., 351 U. S. 984. Kansas City Southern…
• Bland v. United States, 299 F.2d 105 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …shown by the Government to justify a conviction. Any prejudice to appellants was cured by these further instructions. Further instructions may correct a possible error previously made, United States v. Tadio, 223 F. 2d 759 (2 C.A.1955) cert. denied 350 U.S. 874, 76 S.Ct. 119, 100 L.Ed. 772. We find no reversible error except the Judge’s failure to reinstruct the jury on the issues of knowledge and intent when he re-read the statute at the jury’s request. The case must be reversed and remanded for this rea…