AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED FRUIT CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Babb v. United States, 351 F.2d 863 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …r the doctrine of “verbal completeness.” Cf. Newman v. United States, 331 F. 2d 968, 970-971 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 975, 85 S.Ct. 672, 13 L.Ed.2d 566 (1965); Smith v. United States, 224 F. 2d 58, 60-61 (5th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 885, 76 S.Ct. 138, 100 L.Ed. 780 (1955). Any relevant and competent evidence of guilt is not rendered inadmissible because it also tends to show the accused committed other offenses. Downey v. United States, 263 F. 2d 552 (10th Cir. 1959); Mehan v. Unit…
• Newman v. United States, 331 F.2d 968 (8th Cir. 1964)
  …sibility of these two witnesses’ direct testimony concerning the operation of the conspiracy, its members, and the key role the defendant played in its unlawful execution. E. g., Smith v. United States, 224 F. 2d 58, 60 (5th Cir. 1955), cert. denied 350 U.S. 885, 76 S.Ct. 138, 100 L.Ed. 780 (1955). In short, the conspiracy instruction did not confuse the jury in their consideration of the statements made by an accomplice as possible substantive evidence of appellant’s guilt. The statements were properly ad…
• Kayser v. United States, 394 F.2d 601 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …rine of “verbal completeness.” Babb v. United States, supra; Newman v. United States, 331 F. 2d 968 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 975, 85 S.Ct. 672, 13 L.Ed.2d 566 (1965); Smith v. United States, 224 F. 2d 58 (5th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 885, 76 S.Ct. 138, 100 L.Ed. 780 (1955). Secondly, the court properly instructed the jury at the time of the question that the answer was not to be considered evidence of defendants’ guilt of this or any other crime, but that it was only a circumstance…