HALFEN

v.

UNITED STATES; PURITAN CHURCH ET AL. V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Noland, 495 F.2d 529 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …e and for leave to file information); United States v. Duhart, 269 F. 2d 113 (2d Cir. 1959) (enhanced sentence vacated and reimposed after discovery that no information had been filed); Knight v. United States, 225 F. 2d 55 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 890, 76 S.Ct. 148, 100 L.Ed. 784 (1955) (Government advised court of defend- ant s prior convictions, which defendant admitted, but did not file information). The above provision was repealed effective May 1, 1971 by the Comprehensive Drug Abuse and C…
• Kirby v. Thomas, 336 F.2d 462 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …ling of ordinary civil actions by prisoners which do not relate to their personal liberty is a- matter of prison discipline and is not in violation of any constitutional restriction. Tabor v. Hardwick, 224 F. 2d 526 (5th Cir. 1955), cert. dismissed, 350 U.S. 890 [76 S.Ct. 148, 100 L.Ed. 784], cert. denied, 350 U.S. 971 [76 S.Ct. 445, 100 L.Ed. 843]; United States ex rel Wagner v. Ragen, 213 F. 2d 294 (7th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 846 [75 S.Ct. 68, 99 L.Ed. 667]; Hatfield v. Bailleaux, 290 F. 2d 63…
• United States v. Fance Bell, 345 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1965)
  …is the identical person previously convicted. There is no claim here that the defendant was not the person who had been previously convicted of a narcotic offense. Another pertinent case is Knight v. United States, 9 Cir., 225 F. 2d 55, cert. den. 350 U.S. 890, 76 S.Ct. 148, 100 L.Ed. 784. There, no information had been filed, but the Court had personal knowledge of the*prior conviction. The Court said, page 57 of 225 F. 2d: “ ‘Information’ as used in this statute does not connote nor require the precise…