OWENS ET AL.

v.

OKLAHOMA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

Citator

Cited By

• Murphy v. Int'l Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2000)
  …Strickland are fully set forth in this Court’s earlier decision in that case, a decision that was reversed by the United States Supreme Court on an issue of federal law. See Seaboard Air Line R.R. v. Strickland, 80 So. 2d 914, 915-17 (Fla.), rev’d, 350 U.S. 893, 76 S.Ct. 157, 100 L.Ed. 786 (1955). The Strickland case that we now analyze came to this Court upon remand from the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. See Strickland, 88 So. 2d at 520. . Neither of this Court's Strickland opinions indicate whethe…
• Atl. Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Barrett, 101 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 1958)
  …ry to the employee. Under the cited decisions which control actions of this kind, that is all that is required. Whatever our views on the subject (Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Strickland, Fla., 80 So. 2d 914, certiorari granted and judgment reversed 350 U.S. 893, 76 S.Ct. 157, 100 L.Ed. 786) or the views of Justice Frankfurter to the effect that “under the guise of suits for negligence, the distortions of the Act’s application have turned it more and more into a workmen’s compensation act, but with all the…
• Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1957)
  …O’Neill v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 348 U. S. 956;* reversal of judgment for plaintiff reversed. 1955 Term. Anderson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 350 U. S. 807;* reversal of judgment for plaintiff reversed. Strickland v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co., 350 U. S. 893;* reversal of judgment for plaintiff reversed. Cahill v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 350 U. S. 898,* 351 U. S. 183; reversal of judgment for plaintiff reversed. * [Note: This dissenting opinion applies also to No. 28, Rogers v. Missouri Pacific…