RUBSAM

v.

HARLEY C. LONEY CO.; TAYLOR V. UNITED STATES; LURIE ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; SWAFFORD V. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO.; PEONY PARK, INC. ET AL. V. O'MALLEY, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.; STERLING V. LOCAL 438, LIBERTY ASSOCIATION OF STEAM & POWER PIPE FITTERS & HELPERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL.; VERCELES V. ILLINOIS; BRABSON V. NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1957)
  …of the case on the merits, individual Justices (including the writer) have merely noted their dissent to the grant without reaching the merits. See, e. g., Anderson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 350 U. S. 807; Cahill v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 350 U. S. 898. Even here, I am bound to say, it would probably be better practice for a Justice, who has unsuccessfully opposed certiorari, to face the merits, and to dissent from the summary disposition rather than from the grant of certiorari if he is not prepa…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Schulz v. Pa. R.R. Co., 350 U.S. 523 (U.S. 1956)
  …out govern me in the conviction that the writ in this case should be dismissed as improvidently granted. McAllister v. United States, 348 U. S. 19, 23; Carter v. Atlanta & St. A. B. R. Co., 338 U. S. 430, 437; Cahill v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 350 U. S. 898; Anderson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 350 U. S. 807; Swafford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 350 U. S. 807; Moore v. Chesapeake & O. R. Co., 340 U. S. 573, 578; Affolder v. New York, C. & St. L. R. Co., 339 U. S. 96, 101; see Frankfurter and Land…
• Cahill v. New York, 351 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1956)
  …the alleged error in admitting the evidence of prior accidents. Cahill then asked us for certiorari. On November 21, 1955, we granted his petition and reversed the Court of Appeals’ judgment, thereby reinstating the judgment of the District Court. 350 U. S. 898. Mr. Justice Reed dissented. Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, and Mr. Justice Harlan expressed the view that certiorari should have been denied; they did not participate in the decision on the merits.2 In a timely petition for rehearing…

  ← 1 / 2 →