DURLEY

v.

MAYO, PRISON CUSTODIAN

Citator

Cited By

• Cole v. Young, 351 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1956)
  …complaint. 125 F. Supp. 284. The [*541] Court of Appeals, with one judge dissenting, affirmed. 96 U. S. App. D. C. 379, 226 F. 2d 337. Because of the importance of the questions involved in the field of Government employment, we granted certiorari. 350 U. S. 900. Section 14 of the Veterans’ Preference Act, 58 Stat. 390, as amended, 5 U. S. C. § 863, provides that preference eligibles may be discharged only “for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the service” and, among other procedural rights, “s…
• Hodgson v. Lum Humphries, 454 F.2d 1279 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …defense in accordance with the requirements of Fed. R.Civ.P. 8(c), 28 U.S.C. See Pena v. Eastern Sugar Associates, 25 CCH Lab. Cas. Jf 68,326, 12 Wage & Hour Cas. 69 (Sup.Ct.P.R.1954), aff’d on other grounds, 222 F. 2d 934 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 350 U.S. 900, 76 S.Ct. 178, 100 L.Ed. 791 (1955); Cope v. Freyn Engineering Co., 8 F.R.D. 620 (W.D.Pa. 1949). At trial Wagoner’s counsel attempted to ascertain whether the Secretary had obtained written consent from the former employees said to be due unpaid wa…
• Durley v. Mayo, 351 U.S. 277 (U.S. 1956)
  …to show probable cause that he was held without lawful authority. A rehearing was denied but petitioner’s application for a writ of certiorari was granted by this Court, 350 U. S. 872, and counsel was appointed by this Court to represent him here, 350 U. S. 900. The case was fully briefed and argued on the jurisdictional issue as well as on the merits. The State of Florida has objected consistently to our entertaining jurisdiction of this proceeding. Its reason is that the Florida Supreme Court’s denial o…