FIREMEN'S INSURANCE CO. ET AL.

v.

EDLIN

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Pearlman in Bankruptcy v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132 (U.S. 1962)
  …o., 85 F. 2d 135 (C. A. 8th Cir. 1936), aff’d, 300 U. S. 588 (1937); In re Scofield Co., 215 F. 45 (C. A. 2d Cir. 1914); National Sur. Corp. v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 724, 133 F. Supp. 381, cert. denied sub nom. First Nat. Bank v. United States, 350 U. S. 902 (1955). See note 2, supra. 28 Stat. 278 (1894), amended, 33 Stat. 811 (1905). Among the problems which would be raised by a contrary result would be the unsettling of the usual view, grounded in commercial practice, that suretyship is not insuran…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Prot. Serv., Inc., 375 F.2d 497 (6th Cir. 1967)
  …. 2d 874 (C.A. 8); N.L.R.B. v. Florida Steel Corp. (Tampa Forge & Iron Div.), 308 F. 2d 931 (C.A. 5); N.L.R.B. v. Adkins Transfer Co., supra; National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Standard Coil Products Co., 224 F. 2d 465, 51 A.L.R.2d 1268 (C.A. 1), cert. den. 350 U.S. 902, 76 S.Ct. 180, 100 L.Ed. 792. ’The Board cannot substitute its judgment for that of the employer as to what constitutes reasonable grounds for discharge. National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Wagner Iron Works, Etc., 220 F. 2d 126 (C.A. 7), cert. den. 350 U.S.…
• Raytheon Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 326 F.2d 471 (1st Cir. 1964)
  …, again, misstated the issue. The question, of course, was what the employer believed and not whether that belief was reasonable. As we said in N. L. R. B. v. Standard Coil Products Co., 1 Cir., 1955, 224 F. 2d 465, 470, 51 A.L.R.2d 1268, cert. den. 350 U.S. 902, 76 S.Ct. 180, 100 L.Ed. 792, “It is well accepted law that an employer may discharge an employee for any reason, reasonable or unreasonable, so long as it is not a reason prohibited by the Act.” See also N. L. R. B. v. Whitin Machine Works, 1 Cir.,…