CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY CO.

v.

KENNEY

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• THE Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1972)
  …proceedings consistent with this opinion. Vacated and remanded. Compare,, e. g., Central Contracting Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 367 F. 2d 341 (CA3 1966), and Wm. H. Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line Ltd., 224 F. 2d 806 (CA2), cert. denied, 350 U. S. 903 (1955), with Carbon Black Export, Inc. v. The Monrosa, 254 F. 2d 297 (CA5 1958), cert. dismissed, 359 U. S. 180 (1959). The General Towage Conditions of the contract included the following: “1. . . . [Unterweser and its] masters and crews are not…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. SS Hong Kong Producer, 422 F.2d 7 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …rsuasive factor in the decision, which also required that a clause of that kind be “not unreasonable in the setting of the particular case.” William H. Muller & Co. v. Swedish American Line Ltd., 224 F. 2d 806, 56 A.L.R.2d 295 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 350 U.S. 903, 76 S.Ct. 182, 100 L.Ed. 793 (1955). The holding did, however, give a certain amount of encouragement to the inclusion of such a clause in a bill of lading wherever the foreign country’s law was less favorable than COGSA to shippers, but such a pr…
• Portmann v. United States, 674 F.2d 1155 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …, but not in its sovereign role, the authorities are not clear about just what activities are encompassed by each.”); United States v. City & County of San Francisco, 112 F.Supp. 451, 454 (N.D.Cal.1953), aff'd 223 F. 2d 737 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 903, 76 S.Ct. 181, 100 L.Ed. 793 (1955) (characterizing distinction as “somewhat nebulous and perhaps attenuated”). See also Note, Equitable Estoppel of the Government, 79 Colum.L.Rev. 551, 557 (1979). . See, e.g., M-R-S Mfg. Co. v. United States, 492…