BERRA
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1955-12-05
No. 60
350 U.S. 910 Supreme Court of the United States (1955) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ry. Employes' Dep't v. Hanson, 351 U.S. 225 (U.S. 1956)
    …t, therefore, held that there is no valid federal law to supersede the “right to work” provision of the Nebraska Constitution. 160 Neb. 669, 71 N. W. 2d 526. The case is here by appeal. 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (1) and (2). We noted probable jurisdiction. 350 U. S. 910. [*231] The union shop 3 provision of the Railway Labor Act was written into the law in 1951. Prior to that date the Railway Labor Act prohibited union shop agreements. 48 Stat. 1186, 45 U. S. C. § 152, Fourth and Fifth; 40 Op. Atty. Gen. 254. Those…
  • Berra v. United States, 351 U.S. 131 (U.S. 1956)
    …h count, the sentences to run concurrently. Thus petitioner has been sentenced to imprisonment greater than the maximum possible had the conviction been under § 3616 (a) alone. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 221 F. 2d 590, and we granted certiorari, 350 U. S. 910, limited to the question of whether it was error for the trial judge to refuse to give the requested instruction. The Court of Appeals, in affirming the conviction, held that § 3616 (a) did not apply to income tax returns, and that any instruction…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw