AGRICULTURAL INSURANCE CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Vuitch, 402 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1971)
  …osition under the conflicting and inadequate interpretations of the D. C. abortion statute now prevailing. The Court of Appeals established by such early cases as Peckham v. United States, 96 U. S. App. D. C. 312, 226 F. 2d 34 (1955), cert. denied 350 U. S. 912, 76 S. Ct. 195, 100 L. Ed. 800, and Williams v. United States, 78 U. S. App. D. C. 147, 138 F. 2d 81, 153 A. L. R. 1213 (1943), that upon the Government establishing that a physician committed an abortion, the burden shifted to the physician to j…
• United States v. Carrion, 463 F.2d 704 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …unsel’s representation of his client or which more clearly demonstrated a bias against the accused. Compare, for example, Bursten v. United States, supra, and Peekham v. United States, 1953, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 136, 210 F. 2d 693, 703-706, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 912, 76 S.Ct. 195, 100 L.Ed. 800. The attitude and behavior of the trial judge here, while involving improper belittling of the prosecutor and defense attorneys, did not quite descend to the level of judicial hostility evident in the cases cited by app…