FLETCHER

v.

YOUNG ET UX.

Citator

Cited By

• Calley v. Callaway, 519 F.2d 184 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …l courts have interpreted Burns with considerable disagreement.20 Soon after the decision in Burns, we noted the “uncertain state of the law” regarding the proper scope of review. Bisson v. Howard, 5 Cir., 1955, 224 F. 2d 586, 589-590, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 916, 76 S.Ct. 201, 100 L.Ed. 803. More recently we said that while Burns allowed collateral attack on courts-martial, “the scope of that review was left uncertain.” Mindes v. Seaman, 5 Cir., 1971, 453 F. 2d 197, 201. We have stated that, since Burns, “…
• United States ex rel. James Rogers v. Warden OF Attica State Prison, 381 F.2d 209 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 843, 86 S.Ct. 89, 15 L.Ed.2d 84 (1965), is deemed to have waived his right to present these claims in an application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See, e. g., Winston v. United States, 224 F. 2d 337 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 350 U.S. 916, 76 S.Ct. 201, 100 L.Ed. 803 (1955); Hoffman v. United States, 327 F. 2d 489 (9th Cir. 1964). . Section 813-d establishes the time for making and determining the defendant’s motions, and also provides that if a timely motion is not made, “the defen…
• Boyce v. Dr. Alizaduh, 595 F.2d 948 (4th Cir. 1979)
  …pauperis suit by prison inmates, has long been approved in this Circuit. Graham v. Riddle (4th Cir. 1977) 554 F. 2d 133, 134-5; Caviness v. Somers (4th Cir. 1956) 235 F. 2d 455, 456; Fletcher v. Young (4th Cir. 1955) 222 F. 2d 222, 224, cert. denied 350 U.S. 916, 76 S.Ct. 201, 100 L.Ed. 802; Mann v. Leeke (D.S.C.1974) 73 F.R.D. 264, 265, aff’d. 551 F. 2d 307; Hawkins v. Elliott (D.S.C.1974) 385 F.Supp. 354, 357; Spears v. United States (S.D.W.Va. 1967) 266 F.Supp. 22, 25; Farley v. Skeen (N.D.W.Va.1953) 113…