NELSON

v.

MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Mori, 444 F.2d 240 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …other although the objects of the conspiracies may partially overlap.” 328 U.S. at 788, 66 S.Ct. at 1129. See generally United States v. Edwards, 2 Cir. 1966, 366 F. 2d 853, 866-867; Masi v. United States, 5 Cir. 1955, 223 F. 2d 132, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 919, 76 S.Ct. 208, 100 L.Ed. 805; United States v. Anderson, 7 Cir. 1939, 101 F. 2d 325; United States v. DeSapio, S.D.N.Y.1969, 299 F.Supp. 436, 440-442; United States v. American Honda Motor Co., N.D.Cal. 1967, 271 F.Supp. 979, 982-987. Since we find…
• Tillman Overstreet v. United States, 321 F.2d 459 (5th Cir. 1963)
  …of more than one federal statute does not make it duplicitous. Williams v. United States, 238 F. 2d 215, 218 (5 Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1024, 77 S.Ct. 589, 1 L.Ed.2d 596 (1957); Masi v. United States, 223 F. 2d 132 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 919, 76 S.Ct. 208, 100 L.Ed. 805 (1955). Of course, where two substantive offenses are named in the same count there is duplicity as was the case in United States v. Goodman, 285 F. 2d 378, 380 (5 Cir. 1960). See also United States v. Gibson, 310 F.…
• United States v. Ohio Power Co., 353 U.S. 98 (U.S. 1957)
  …Per Curiam. On June 11, 1956, we unanimously vacated sua sponte our order of December 5, 1955 (350 U. S. 919), denying the timely petition for rehearing in this case (351 U. S. 980), so that this case might be disposed of consistently with the companion cases of United States v. Allen-Bradley Co., 352 U. S. 306, and National Lead Co. v. Commissioner, 352 U…

  ← 1 / 2 →