LAWLOR ET AL., TRADING AS INDEPENDENT POSTER EXCHANGE,

v.

NATIONAL SCREEN SERVICE CORPORATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144 (U.S. 1963)
  …eated by § 349 (a) (10) is wholly at odds with the decisions of the Court which hold that in cases such as this a heavy burden is upon the Government to prove an act of expatriation by clear, convincing, and unequivocal evidence. Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U. S. 920; Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U. S. 129. This standard commands that “evidentiary ambiguities are not to be resolved against the citizen.” Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U. S., at 136. Without pausing to consider whether this evidentiary standard is a consti…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Woodby v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 385 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1966)
  …Wigmore, Evidence §§ 2488-2493, 2497-2498 (3d ed. 1940). Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U. S. 118; Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U. S. 665; Nowak v. United States, 356 U. S. 660; Chaunt v. United States, 364 U. S. 350. Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U. S. 920; Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U. S. 129. But see § 349 (c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 75 Stat. 656 (1961), 8 U. S. C. § 1481 (c). This standard, or an even higher one, has traditionally been imposed in cases involving allegations of civil…
• Nishikawa v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1958)
  …nship claimant proves his birth in this country or acquisition of American citizenship in some other way, the burden is upon the Government to prove an act that shows expatriation by clear, convincing and unequivocal evidence. In Oonzales v. London, 350 U. S. 920, we held that the rule as to burden of proof in denaturalization cases4 applied to expatriation cases under Section 401 (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940. We now conclude that the same rule should govern cases under all the subsections of Section 4…

  ← 1 / 4 →