GONZALES
v.
LANDON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ET AL.
GONZALES
LANDON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ET AL.
350 U.S. 920
Supreme Court of the United States (1955)
Caution
Also reported at: 100 L. Ed. 806 · 76 S. Ct. 210 · 1955 U.S. LEXIS 3 · SCDB 1955-062
Cited by 42 cases
Per_curiam
Cer-tiorari, 349 U. S. 943, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Argued December 7-8, 1955. Decided December 12, 1955.
Per Curiam:
The Court is of the view that the standard of proof required in denaturalization cases (see Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U. S. 118; Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U. S. 665) is applicable to expatriation cases arising under § 401 (j) of the Nationality Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 1137, as amended, and has not been satisfied in this case. Accordingly the judgment below is reversed without reaching the constitutional questions that have been presented.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Collins Sec. Corp. & Timothy Collins v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 562 F.2d 820 (D.C. Cir. 1977)…(3d ed. 1940). . 385 U.S. 276, 286, 87 S.Ct. 483, 487, 17 L.Ed.2d 362 (1966). . Id. at 285, 87 S.Ct. at 487. . Ibid. . E.g., Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118, 63 S.Ct. 1333, 87 L.Ed.2d 1796 (1943). . Gonzales v. Landon, 350 U.S. 920, 76 S.Ct. 210, 100 L.Ed. 806 (1955). . 385 U.S. at 286, 87 S.Ct. at 488. . Id. at 285, 87 S.Ct. at 488. . Id. at 285 n. 18, 87 S.Ct. at 488. . E.g., United States v. American Bell Telephone Co., 167 U.S. 224, 17 S.Ct. 809, 42 L.Ed. 144 (1897); Clayton v. Jame…
-
Fogarty v. United States, 263 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1959)…y competent witness a declaration against interest made by any party to litigation. The principle was succinctly stated by the Ninth Circuit in the recent case of Gonzales v. Landon, 1954, 215 F. 2d 955, 957, reversed on other grounds 350 U.S. 920, 76 S.Ct. 210, 100 L.Ed. 806: “But these extrajudicial statements of plaintiff were not hearsay. These were substantive evidence. The extrajudicial statements of a party to the action, civil or criminal, are binding upon him and substantive evidence against him.…
-
LAS Vegas Hacienda, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 298 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1962)
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118 (U.S. 1943)
- Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U.S. 665 (U.S. 1944)
- Shelton v. United States, 349 U.S. 943 (U.S. 1955)
- Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd., 349 U.S. 943 (U.S. 1955)