GORDON

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Arteaga-Limones, 529 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …Macon area. If the jury believed that McDuffie actually performed these acts, they logically would infer from that conduct that he possessed the requisite criminal intent. See Fallen v. United States, 5th Cir. 1955, 220 F. 2d 946, 948, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 924, 76 S.Ct. 213, 100 L.Ed. 808. An almost identical situation is presented in the instant case. The alleged co-conspirator Castillo gave a compendious account of the smuggling operation, including approximate dates, places, participants and details o…
• United States v. Miller, 500 F.2d 751 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …e Macon area. If the jury believed that McDuffie actually performed these acts, they logically would infer from that conduct that he possessed the requisite criminal intent. See Fallen v. United States, 5 Cir. 1955, 220 F. 2d 946, 948, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 924, 76 S.Ct. 213, 100 L.Ed. 808. In its brief on appeal the government lists several instances during McDuffie’s trial testimony in which he offered innocent explanations for potentially suspi [*763] cious acts (e. g., a fingerprint on a jug found at…
• Landsdown v. United States, 348 F.2d 405 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …he lack of relevance that possession of the tools had to the crime charged, that their admission into evidence was erroneous. Giordano v. United States, 6th Cir. 1950, 185 F. 2d 524; Fallen v. United States, 5th Cir. 1955, 220 F. 2d 946, cert. den., 350 U.S. 924, 76 S.Ct. 213, 100 L.Ed. 808. See White v. United States, 9th Cir. 1961, 294 F. 2d 952, cert. den., 375 U.S. 821, 84 S.Ct. 58, 11 L.Ed.2d 55; Pearson v. United States, 6th Cir., 1951, 192 F. 2d 681. In response to examination relative to their rea…