WALL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Jurek v. Estelle, 623 F.2d 929 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …arolina, 383 F. 2d 892, 896 (4th Cir. 1967); United States ex rel. Crump v. Sain, 295 F. 2d 699, 701 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 830, 82 S.Ct. 845, 7 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962); Cranor v. Gonzales, 226 F. 2d 83, 94 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 935, 76 S.Ct. 307, 100 L.Ed. 816 (1956). Cf. United States v. Johnson, 608 F. 2d 725, 730 (9th Cir. 1979) (applying clearly erroneous standard on direct appeal in a federal criminal case). But see, e. g., Makarewicz v. Scafati, 438 F. 2d 474, 477 (1…
• United States v. Indelicato, 611 F.2d 376 (1st Cir. 1979)
  …onable doubt that appellant willfully associated himself in some way with the criminal venture and willfully participated in it as he would in something he wished to bring about. Roberts v. United States, 226 F. 2d 464 (6th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 935, 76 S.Ct. 307, 100 L.Ed. 817 (1956). Proof of the existence of a substantive crime is an element of the offense of aiding and abetting. United States v. McCoy, 539 F. 2d 1050, 1064 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 919, 97 S.Ct. 2185, 53 L.E…
• United States v. Nimrod Solomon and George Sommer, 422 F.2d 1110 (7th Cir. 1970)
  …0 loan to Air and Space Manufacturing Company. It is apparent that the Miller-Solomon transactions were part of the indictment scheme and therefore admissible in evidence. United States v. Wall, 225 F. 2d 905, 907 (7th Cir. 1955), certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 935, 76 S.Ct. 307, 100 L.Ed. 816. Even so, Solomon contends that the trial judge should have instructed the jury sua sponte that the Miller evidence had a “limited purpose — to show intent and knowledge.” Assuming such an instruction could have been de…