INTERSIMONE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Birchfield v. United States, 296 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …tions made here present, of course, a classic case of the situation envisaged by § 2255. Lampe v. Clemmer, 4 Cir., 1958, 251 F. 2d 465, cert. den. 356 U.S. 944, 78 S.Ct. 791, 2 L.Ed.2d 820; Neigut v. Kearney, 5 Cir., 1955, 221 F. 2d 803, cert. den., 350 U.S. 939, 76 S.Ct. 311, 100 L.Ed. 819; Overman v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir., 1958, 256 F. 2d 58, cert. den., 358 U.S. 887, 79 S.Ct. 129, 3 L.Ed.2d 115; Smith v. Reid, D.C.Cir., 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 191 F. 2d 491. The fact that at least two proceedings under §…
• Kaufman v. Wilkinson, 237 F.2d 519 (5th Cir. 1956)
  …counsel was not one of the grounds upon which the petition was filed, and was, therefore, not passed on by the court below. It, of course, cannot be considered here. Upon the authority of Neigut v. Kearney, 5 Cir., 221 F. 2d 803; certiorari denied 350 U.S. 939, 76 S.Ct. 311, and cases there cited, the judgment of the trial court is Affirmed. . “An application for a writ of habeas corpus in behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by motion pursuant to this section, shall not be enterta…