MARCH

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Thomas v. Arizona, 356 U.S. 390 (U.S. 1958)
  …re the confession as evidence unless it was found entirely voluntary. A general verdict of guilty was returned by the jury and accepted by the trial court. The Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed, 78 Ariz. 52, 275 P. 2d 408, and we denied certiorari.1 350 U. S. 950 (1956). Petitioner then made application for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. After reviewing the entire record, the District Court denied the writ without a hearing. The Court of Appeals [*393] affirmed…
• Spencer v. Kemp, 781 F.2d 1458 (11th Cir. 1986)
  …enge to the array to be exercised at a later time.10 See Williams v. State, 210 Ga. 665, 82 S.E. 2d 217, 219-20 (1954), remanded for reconsideration, 349 U.S. 375, 75 S.Ct. 814, 99 L.Ed. 1161, aff'd, 211 Ga. 763, 88 S.E. 2d 376 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 950, 76 S.Ct. 326, 100 L.Ed. 828 (1956). Petitioner's motion to challenge the jury array was not raised in the state proceedings until voir dire was well under way.11 According to long-established Georgia law, Spencer’s challenge thus appears not to ha…
• Thomas v. Eyman, 235 F.2d 775 (9th Cir. 1956)
  …the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, A. C.A.1939, §§ 44-2002 and 44-2004 (c). . State v. Thomas, 79 Ariz. 158, 285 P. 2d 612. . State v. Thomas, 78 Ariz. 52, 275 P. 2d 408, . State v. Thomas, 79 Ariz. 158, 285 P. 2d 612. . Thomas v. Arizona, 350 U.S. 950, 76 S. Ct. 326. . W. Edward Morgan, Hayzel B. Daniels and I. B. Tomlinson were counsel for appellant in the Superior Court and in the Arizona Supreme Court. . Each application consisted of an affidavit made and signed by Morgan. Appellant did not…