MICHEL
v.
LOUISIANA; PORET ET AL. V. LOUISIANA; BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL CO. V. LYON; LAZAROV ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; PECKHAM V. UNITED STATES; DRAWDY INVESTMENT CO. V. LEONARD ET UX.; CEPERO V. PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS, INC.
MICHEL
LOUISIANA; PORET ET AL. V. LOUISIANA; BAUSCH & LOMB OPTICAL CO. V. LYON; LAZAROV ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; PECKHAM V. UNITED STATES; DRAWDY INVESTMENT CO. V. LEONARD ET UX.; CEPERO V. PAN AMERICAN AIRWAYS, INC.
350 U.S. 955
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Delbert Taylor, 832 F.2d 1187 (10th Cir. 1987)…, the defendant must overcome the presumption that, under the circumstances, the challenged action ‘might be considered sound trial strategy.’” Id., quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. 158, 164, 100 L.Ed. 83 (1955), reh’g denied, 350 U.S. 955, 76 S.Ct. 340, 100 L.Ed. 831 (1956). Even where counsel’s performance has fallen “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance,” id. at 690, 104 S.Ct. at 2066, a defendant must still overcome the second prong of the Strickland test…
-
Welch v. Theodorides-Bustle, 234 F. Supp. 171 (N.D. Fla. 2010)