RAILWAY EMPLOYES' DEPARTMENT, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR, ET AL.

v.

HANSON ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Cahill v. New York, 351 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1956)
  …can be no possible doubt that a proper way to raise the sort of question here presented is by filing a petition for rehearing. Our records are filled with proof of this. The latest example is our action in Union Trust Co. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 350 U. S. 962, decided February 27, 1956. We granted relief in that case of precisely the same kind that the railroad here asked us to grant in its petition for rehearing and asks us again to grant in its “motion to recall.” There is nothing new about granting th…
• United States v. Aarons, 310 F.2d 341 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …knew just what-the Government required of them. See Eastern Air Lines v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189, 221 F. 2d 62, 69 (1955) , rev’d on other grounds, 350 U.S. 907, 76 S.Ct. 192, 100 L.Ed. 796, order of reversal modified and case remanded, 350 U.S. 962, 76 S.Ct. 429, 100 L.Ed. 835-(1956), ruling on this issue adhered to, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 205, 239 F. 2d 25, 28 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 942, 77 S.Ct. 816, 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957); United States v. Reid, 110 F.Supp. 253, 256-257 (D.Md.1955); 1 Davis,…
• E. AIR Lines, Inc. v. Union Tr. Co., 239 F.2d 25 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
  …or rehearing the order of December 5, 1955, ante, p. 907 is reopened and is modified by directing that the case be remanded to the Court of Appeals to permit that court to pass upon the several issues left undecided by our reversal of its judgment.” 350 U.S. 962, 76 S.Ct. 429. Thus the cases are again before us. Supplemental briefs have been filed and further oral argument has been heard. Eastern Air Lines urges it was deprived of a fair trial by the plaintiff’s “clear design to destroy the character, int…