LA BUY

v.

HOWES LEATHER CO., INC. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rogers v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 352 U.S. 500 (U.S. 1957)
  …r dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter, see post, p. 524.] [For opinion of Mr. Justice Harlan, dissenting in this case, see post, p. 559.] i 35 Stat. 65, as amended, 36 Stat. 291, 53 Stat. 1404, 45 XJ. S. C. 51 et seq. 284 S. W. 2d 467. 350 U. S. 964. Lillie v. Thompson, 332 U. S. 459. 284 S. W. 2d, at 472. Ibid. Myers v. Reading Co., 331 U. S. 477. “The very essence of [the jury’s] function is to select from among conflicting inferences and conclusions that which it considers most reasonab…
• La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., Inc., 352 U.S. 249 (U.S. 1957)
  …ich he complains. 226 F. 2d 703. The importance of the question in the administration of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, together with the uncertainty existing on the issue among the Courts of Appeals, led to our grant of a writ of certiorari. 350 U. S. 964. We conclude that the Court of Appeals properly issued the writs of mandamus. History of the Litigation. — These petitions for mandamus, filed in the Court of Appeals, arose from two antitrust actions instituted in the District Court in 1950.1 Roh…
• Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United States, 352 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1957)
  …ral rights claimed by appellant.” 224 F. 2d 381, 383-384. Because of the presence of important and difficult questions of federal-state relations, questions [*224] more difficult than the Government appears to have found them, we granted certiorari. 350 U. S. 964. 28 U. S. C. § 2283 provides: “A court of the United States may not grant an injunction to stay proceedings in a State court except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress, or where necessary in aid of its jurisdiction, or to protect or effectu…