KLUBNIKIN
v.
UNITED STATES
KLUBNIKIN
UNITED STATES
350 U.S. 975
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 17 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (17 total)
-
Petrie v. United States, 407 F.2d 267 (9th Cir. 1969)…tates, 235 F. 2d 339, 343 (9th Cir. 1956); United States v. Burlich, 257 F.Supp. 906, 911 (S.D.N.Y. 1966); United States v. Majher, 250 F.Supp. 106, 110 (S.D.W.Va.1966); see Klubnikin v. United States, 227 F. 2d 87, 89 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 975, 76 S.Ct. 453, 100 L.Ed. 846 (1965) ; cf. United States v. Ruppell, 278 F.Supp. 287, 290 (E.D.N.Y. 1968). Judge Hamley of our court has expressed the rule concisely: “Refusal of a local board to reopen on the ground that the newly-asserted facts wou…1 / 2
-
Boyd v. United States, 269 F.2d 607 (9th Cir. 1959)…enial of procedural due process to refuse him a right of appeal from a local board’s refusal to reopen his classification has been laid to rest by this Court in Klubnikin v. United States, 9 Cir., 1955, 227 F. 2d 87, 90-91,7 certiorari denied, 1956, 350 U.S. 975, 76 S.Ct. 453, 100 L.Ed. 846. [*612] Of the cases relied on by appellant we find Olvera v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 880, clearly distinguishable since there the conscientious objector claim was made before the induction notice was sent…
-
Emil Yaich v. United States, 283 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1960)…United States v. Niles, D.C.D.C.N.D.Cal. 1954, 122 F.Supp. 382, affirmed 9 Cir., 1955, 220 F. 2d 278, certiorari denied 1955, 349 U.S. 939, 75 S.Ct. 784, 99 L.Ed.. 1267; Klubnikin v. United States, 9 Cir., 1955, 227 F. 2d 87, certiorari denied 1956, 350 U.S. 975, 76 S.Ct. 453, 100 L.Ed. 846. In our view the three types of civilian work offered appellant by the local board were in substantial compliance with Se [*620] lective Service Regulation 1660.20(b). In any event appellant having categorically refused…
Previewing 3 of 17 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence