BILBAO

v.

UNITED STATES; SHERMAN V. UNITED STATES; AND GREEN V. NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Janich Bros., Inc. v. The Am. Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …ir. 1969); Continental Oil Co. v. Frontier Refining Co., 338 F. 2d 780, 782 (10th Cir. 1964); Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. FTC, 289 F. 2d 835, 840 (7th Cir. 1961); Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co., 231 F. 2d 356, 368 (9th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 991, 76 S.Ct. 545, 100 L.Ed. 856 (1956). . As we have stated on another occasion, “[t]he antitrust laws were not intended, and may not be used to require businesses to price their products at unreasonably high prices (which penalize the consumer) so th…
• Falls City Indus., Inc. v. Vanco Bev., Inc., 460 U.S. 428 (U.S. 1983)
  …ghout a particular region. See William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 668 F. 2d 1014, 1046 (CA9 1981), cert. denied, 459 U. S. 825 (1982); Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co., 231 F. 2d 356, 366 (CA9 1955), cert. denied, 350 U. S. 991 (1956); Rowe, at 235-236. In such circumstances, customer-by-customer negotiations would be unlikely to result in prices different from those set according to information relating to competitors’ territorial prices. A customer-by-customer requiremen…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 289 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1961)
  …nce, a contest for trade”. United States v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, D.C.E.D.Mo.1931, 47 F. 2d 288, 297; Balian Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co., D.C.S.D.Cal.1952, 104 F. Supp. 796, 801, affirmed 9 Cir., 1955, 231 F. 2d 356, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 991, 76 S.Ct. 545, 100 L.Ed. 856. “Competition * * * is a battle for something that only one can get; one competitor must necessarily lose.” Sinclair Refining Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 7 Cir., 1921, 276 F. 686, 688, affirmed 261 U.S. 463, 43 S.Ct…