ZACHER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sears, 421 U.S. 132 (U.S. 1975)
  …ll, 108 U. S. App. D. C. 106, 280 F. 2d 654 (1960); O’Keefe v. Boeing Co., 38 F. R. D. 329 (SDNY 1965); Walled Lake Door Co. v. United States, 31 F. R. D. 258 (ED Mich. 1962); Zacher v. United States, 227 F. 2d 219, 226 (CA8 1955), cert. denied, 350 U. S. 993 (1956); Clark v. Pear [*152] son, 238 F. Supp. 495, 496 (DC 1965); and communications made after the decision and designed to explain it, which are not.19 Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 146 U. S. App. D. C. 237, 450 F. 2d 698 (1971); GSA v. Benson, 4…
• Rowoldt v. Perfetto, 355 U.S. 115 (U.S. 1957)
  …t held that the evidence produced at the hearing was sufficient to sustain the finding that petitioner was a “member” of the Communist Party. 228 F. 2d 109. As the case involves an application of Galvan v. Press, 347 U S. 522, we granted certiorari. 350 U. S. 993. The authority for the order deporting petitioner derives from the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended by the Act of March 28, 1951, 65 Stat. 28. As indicated, its evidentiary support rests entirely on petitioner’s testimony before an immigra…
• Bailey v. United States, 410 F.2d 1209 (10th Cir. 1969)
  …ing in this case is the criterion to be applied in determining whether there was an impingement upon the right of the appellant to be tried before a fair and impartial jury.” Rubenstein v. United States, 10 Cir., 227 F. 2d 638, at 643; cert. denied, 350 U.S. 993, 76 S.Ct. 542, 100 L.Ed. 858. The results of the trial disclose that the jury discounted this incident and performed its duty free from external pressure. Appellant Bailey vigorously attacks the sufficiency of the evidence to connect him with the o…