ALEXANDER

v.

IRVING TRUST CO., EXECUTOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• United States v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678 (3d Cir. 1964)
  …se of the rule is to avoid whenever possible the necessity of a time-consuming new trial by providing the trial judge with an opportunity to correct any mistakes in the charge. See Palmer v. United States, 229 F. 2d 861 (10 Cir.), certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 996, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 861 (1956). By virtue of general law and Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,8 this court has the power to consider sua sponte errors affecting substantial rights in cases where no objection was taken. Our…
• Beck v. The United States, 305 F.2d 595 (10th Cir. 1962)
  …eans of false pretenses,, representations or promises, and (2) the-use of the United States mails in furtherance of such scheme or artifice. Marvin v. United States, 10 Cir., 279 F. 2d 451; Palmer v. United States, 10 Cir., 229 F. 2d 861, cert. den. 350 U.S. 996, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 861; Webb v. United States, 10 Cir., 191 F. 2d 512. Such proof may be made by either direct- or circumstantial evidence. United States v. Ross, 92 U.S. 281, 23 L.Ed. 707; Whealton v. United States, CCA 3, 113 F. 2d 710; Brad…
• Gonzales v. United States, 286 F.2d 118 (10th Cir. 1960)
  …ortunity to correct errors. Rule 30, Fed.Rules Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C.A.; Hayes v. United States, 10 Cir., 238 F. 2d 318, certiorari denied 353 U.S. 983, 77 S.Ct. 1280, 1 L.Ed.2d 1142; Palmer v. United States, 10 Cir., 229 F. 2d 861, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 996, 76 S.Ct. 546, 100 L.Ed. 861. Gonzales also raises the question of whether the alleged false or fraudulent statements had to do with [*123] matters within the jurisdiction of the E.E.A. He asserts, in effect, that unless the E.E.A. was authorized b…