NOTTAGE

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Schultz, 286 F.2d 753 (7th Cir. 1961)
  …to the sufficiency of the evidence or involving errors of law or fact at the trial, must be raised by appeal from the judgment of conviction and not by a petition under section 2255. Bocock v. United States, 7 Cir., 226 F. 2d 720, certiorari denied 350 U.S. 999, 76 S.Ct. 552, 100 L.Ed. 863; United States v. Spadafora, 7 Cir., 207 F. 2d 291. A careful examination of the record convinces us that appellant’s constitutional rights were given full protection on his trial before Judge Grubb. He was represented…
• Pearson v. United States, 305 F.2d 34 (7th Cir. 1962)
  …. United States, 7 Cir., 287 F. 2d 374, 375 (1961), cert. [*36] denied, 366 U.S. 939, 81 S.Ct. 1668, 6 L.Ed.2d 850; United States v. Schultz, 7 Cir., 286 F. 2d 753, 754-755 (1961); Bocock v. United States, 7 Cir., 226 F. 2d 720 (1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 999, 76 S.Ct. 552, 100 L.Ed. 863. As these cases aptly point out, § 2255 does not provide a method to try over again cases in which defendants have been adjudged guilty of crime, and such a collateral proceeding cannot be utilized in lieu of an appeal.…
• United States v. Ramsey, 297 F.2d 503 (7th Cir. 1962)
  …nse of entrapment, and alleged errors in instruction, are all questions for review on appeal and not properly raised for the first time in collateral attack in a motion of this nature. Bocock v. United States, 7 Cir., 1955, 226 F. 2d 720, cert. den. 350 U.S. 999, 76 S.Ct. 552, 100 L.Ed. 863; United States v. Schultz, 7 Cir., 1961, 286 F. 2d 753, 755. No objection was raised to the instructions given. No instruction on entrapment was tendered. In any case, the evidence did not raise any issue of entrapment…