NILVA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Nilva v. United States, 352 U.S. 385 (U.S. 1957)
  …nt for a year and a day. On June 3, it released him on bail but denied his motion to suspend his sentence and grant him probation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, 227 F. 2d 74, and denied rehearing, 228 F. 2d 134. We granted certiorari. 350 U. S. 1005. Although the District Court found petitioner guilty of contempt on each of the three specifications, the Government now concedes that the convictions on the first two are of doubtful validity and does not undertake [*392] to sustain them. Conseque…
• Ind. & Mich. Elec. Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 502 F.2d 336 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …the Commission’s order on April 10, 1973. We are without authority under the Federal Power Act to rescind or suspend the effectiveness of the proposed amendment. See also Phillips Petroleum Co. v. FPC, 227 F. 2d 470 (10th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1005, 76 S.Ct. 649, 100 L.Ed. 868 (1956). It is to be observed that I & M’s application of 18 July 1972, asking for a Commission order making the new rate schedule effective retroactively as of 14 July, would possibly have permitted the Commission to is…
• Belco Petroleum Corp. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 589 F.2d 680 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …urpose of the suspension power is to maintain the status quo for up to five months during which the Commission can investigate the reasonableness of the proposed rate. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. FPC, 227 F. 2d 470, 474 (10th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1005, 76 S.Ct. 649, 100 L.Ed. 868 (1956). Yet that is not its only purpose. A good example of the broader implication of section 4(e)’s suspension power is apparent in Hunt Oil Co. v. FPC, 398 F. 2d 746 (5th Cir. 1968), in which four independent natura…