ALLENDALE COMPANY ET AL.
v.
MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, ET AL.

U.S. | 1956-04-23
No. 755
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
351 U.S. 909 Supreme Court of the United States (1956) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nuesse v. Camp, 385 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
    …velopment Corp. v. United States, 379 F. 2d 818, at 824 (5th Cir., June 12, 1967). As we said in Textile Workers Union v. Allendale Co., 96 U.S.App.D.C. 401, 403, 226 F. 2d 765, 767 (1955) (en banc), cert. denied sub nom. Allendale Co. v. Mitchell, 351 U.S. 909, 76 S.Ct. 699, 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956) in permitting intervention: “[o]bviously tailored to fit ordinary civil litigation, these provisions [of Rule 24] require other than literal application in atypical cases. Administrative cases, as the present one…
  • …bound by it under the doctrine of res judicata. Hence, intervention is vital to the appellants in No. 16,725. We are of the opinion, as this court held in Textile Workers Union of America v. Allendale Co., 96 U.S.App.D.C. 401, 226 F. 2d 765, c. d. 351 U.S. 909, 76 S.Ct. 699, 100 L.Ed. 1444, that in actions brought by a private person to have an order or regulation of an administrative agency adjudged invalid, the res judicata test for determining whether an applicant for intervention in the action will be…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw