COFFMAN
v.
OHIO
COFFMAN
OHIO
351 U.S. 923
Supreme Court of the United States (1956)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 (U.S. 1959)…is of the relief granted. Both state and federal law played a part but, “[a]ny distinction as between those laws was not thoroughly explored.” Garmon v. San Diego Bldg. Trades Council, 49 Cal. 2d 595, 602, 320 P. 2d 473, 477. We granted certiorari, 351 U. S. 923, and decided the case together with Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U. S. 1, and Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Fairlawn Meats, Inc., 353 U. S. 20. In those cases, we held that the refusal of the National Labor Relations Board to assert jurisdi…
-
San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. Garmon, 353 U.S. 26 (U.S. 1957)…ement unless and until one or another of the unions had been designated as the collective bargaining representative of respondents’ employees. It also awarded respondents $1,000 damages. The California Supreme Court affirmed.3 We granted certiorari. 351 U. S. 923. Recognizing that respondents’ business affected interstate commerce, it concluded that the Board’s declination, in pursuance of its announced jurisdictional policy, to handle respondents’ representation petition left the state courts free to act.4…